A recent case that came before the High Court has concluded that a section of the Road Traffic Act is unconstitutional.  The section relates to offences where a person is charged with holding a mobile phone while driving.   Many people coming before the Courts had argued that they had not received a Fixed Charge Notice which would result in a lesser penalty being imposed on them.  The section of the Act which was deemed unconstitutional stated that a person coming before the Courts cannot have a defence by demonstrating that the Fixed Charge Notice was not served on them.

The Judge dealing with the case stated that the law did not distinguish between those who chose not to pay a first Fixed Charge Notice and those who genuinely did not receive it.  Accordingly defendants coming before the Courts may receive different penalties due to circumstances wholly outside their control.   The Judge held that this was unconstitutional and quashed the conviction. 

No final orders have been made as yet which will enable the Government to bring in emergency legislation to rectify the position.   This matter could easily be resolved by ensuring that all  Fixed Charge Penalty Notices are served by registered post .  The Judge also suggested that if a District Court Judge had a discretion to impose a fine and penalty points at the level of the first Fixed Charge Notice that this may also be a further solution.   

The Government’s response is awaited.

Donogh McGowan LLP

Gerrard L. McGowan LLP Solicitors


01 8412115

Notice To ClientsGerrard L. McGowan LLP Solicitors

Notification of Authorisation of Gerrard L. McGowan Solicitors to operate as an LLP (Limited Liability Partnership).

Under the Legal Services Regulation Act, 2015 (Limited Liability Partnerships) (Section 130) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 519 of 2019) as soon as practicable after we have been authorised to operate as an LLP we are obliged to provide the following information to our clients and creditors: –

(a) Gerrard L. McGowan Solicitors have been authorised to operate, and are now operating, as an LLP (hereinafter called “the LLP”);

(b) The LLP has been authorised with effect from 3rd May 2021;

(c) From 3rd May 2021, as set out in section 123 of the Act (subject to the exceptions listed therein), a partner in the LLP has no personal liability for any debts, liabilities or obligations which are incurred for the purpose of carrying on the business of the LLP (whether these are liabilities of the LLP, of himself or herself, of another partner or partners in the LLP or of any employee, agent or representative of the LLP) and however such liability may arise;

(d) That (c) above relates only to the personal liability of partners and does not prevent or restrict the enforcement against the property of the LLP of any debt, liability or obligation; and

(e) that from 3rd May 2021 the Partnership Act 1890 applies to the LLP to the extent that it is not inconsistent with Chapter 3 of Part 8 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015.

Dated: 3rd May 2021